Skip to content

Kamatera vs Vultr

A side-by-side, data-backed comparison — no opinions without numbers.

Zero downtime, but speed costs $1 more

At $4.00/month for 1GB RAM and a single vCPU, the base cloud server hits 100% uptime across 30, 90, and 365 days — no recorded outages. But that reliability comes with a 327ms TTFB and 1169ms fully loaded time, measured from a desktop client.

The $5.00/month cloud compute tier cuts latency to 90ms TTFB (269ms fully loaded) for $1.00 extra, with identical uptime. Storage jumps from 20GB to 25GB at this tier, while RAM and vCPU stay fixed. No middle ground: the next step is $10.00/month for 2GB RAM and 55GB storage.

KamateraVultr
From / month $4.00 $5.00
HostingTweaks score7.87.6
PageSpeed score
LCP
Uptime (30d)99.71%100%
Tierdev clouddev cloud

Feature-by-feature

FeatureKamateraVultr
Performance & infrastructure
Datacenters10 locations11 locations
StorageSSDNVMe SSD
Features & products
SSH access
Security
HTTPS
Security headers53
Support
24/7Business hours
Channels24/7 live chat, ticket, phoneticket, knowledge base
Knowledge base
Response timeLive chat, 24/7Ticket/email

The verdict

Kamatera takes the higher overall HostingTweaks score (7.8 vs 7.6). Kamatera is cheaper to start — about $1.00/mo less.

Higher score

Kamatera

Better value

Kamatera

Faster (PSI)

Expert verdict

Who’s it for?

If you need absolute bottom-dollar pricing and can work within 1GB RAM/20GB storage, the $4.00 cloud server is the clear pick. But the $1.00/month jump to the $5.00 cloud compute plan buys you:

  • 2.7x faster TTFB (90ms vs 327ms)
  • 4.3x faster fully loaded time (269ms vs 1169ms)
  • 25GB storage (vs 20GB)

Both deliver 100% uptime across all tracked periods. The trade-off is simple: pay $1.00 more for significantly better performance and slightly more storage, or squeeze every cent from the base plan.

Verdict: The $5.00 tier is the smarter buy unless every dollar counts. The performance gap outweighs the price gap.

FAQ

How much slower is the entry-level Cloud Server vs. Cloud Compute?

The data shows a clear performance gap:

  • Cloud Server: 327ms TTFB, 1169ms fully loaded
  • Cloud Compute: 90ms TTFB, 269ms fully loaded

That’s a 263% slower first byte and 335% longer full load time for the $4.00 Cloud Server versus the $5.00 Compute option.

Is the uptime actually 100%?

Our 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day tracking all show 100% uptime for both Cloud Server and Cloud Compute plans. No recorded outages in the past year.

What’s the real cost difference between the $4 and $5 plans?

The $1.00/month gap buys you:

  • 5GB more storage (20GB → 25GB)
  • 72% faster TTFB (327ms → 90ms)
  • 77% faster full page loads (1169ms → 269ms)

Same RAM (1GB) and vCPU (1 core) on both.

Does the $10 Compute plan justify doubling the price?

At $10.00/month (vs. $5.00), the 2GB Compute plan delivers:

  • 2x RAM (1GB → 2GB)
  • 2.2x storage (25GB → 55GB)
  • Same vCPU (1 core)
  • Identical performance metrics (90ms TTFB, 269ms loaded)

Only upgrade if you need the resources, not speed.

Kamatera — LCP
Collecting time-series…

Reproducible, timestamped — how we test.

Vultr — LCP
Collecting time-series…

Reproducible, timestamped — how we test.

Want a different matchup? Compare differently →