Skip to content

Cloudways vs Vultr

A side-by-side, data-backed comparison — no opinions without numbers.

Reliability at a Price

Two hosts, identical uptime: 100% over 30, 90, and 365 days. But one charges $11/month for 1GB RAM, 1 vCPU, and 25GB storage—the same specs another delivers for $5. That’s a $6/month premium for zero additional uptime.

The data shows no technical justification for the gap. Both delivered sub-300ms fully loaded times (245ms vs. 269ms), with near-identical TTFB (100ms vs. 90ms). If uptime is your sole metric, either works. But the price difference buys you nothing measurable in performance or redundancy.

CloudwaysVultr
From / month $11.00 $5.00
HostingTweaks score8.17.6
PageSpeed score
LCP
Uptime (30d)100%100%
Tierdev clouddev cloud

Feature-by-feature

FeatureCloudwaysVultr
Performance & infrastructure
Datacenters9 locations11 locations
StorageSSDNVMe SSD
Features & products
SSH access
Staging
WooCommerce
WordPressOptimised
Security
HTTPS
Security headers03
Support
24/7Business hours
Channels24/7 live chat, ticket, knowledge baseticket, knowledge base
Knowledge base
Managed support
Response timeLive chat, 24/7Ticket/email

The verdict

Cloudways takes the higher overall HostingTweaks score (8.1 vs 7.6). Vultr is cheaper to start — about $6.00/mo less.

Higher score

Cloudways

Better value

Vultr

Faster (PSI)

Expert verdict

The Short Version

At $5.00/month for 1GB RAM, 1 vCPU, and 25GB storage, this is the cheapest entry point among comparable managed hosts. You save $6.00/month versus the next option, with identical uptime (100% over 30/90/365 days).

Trade-offs:

  • TTFB (90ms) and fully loaded time (269ms) are marginally slower than the $11.00 alternative (100ms/245ms)
  • RAM and vCPU don’t scale linearly — the 2GB tier ($10.00) still uses 1 vCPU, just doubling RAM and storage (55GB)

Who It’s For

Budget-first users who prioritize upfront savings over marginal performance gains. The uptime record eliminates reliability concerns, but latency-sensitive projects should weigh the 19ms TTFB gap against the $6.00/month savings.

FAQ

How does the entry price compare to DigitalOcean's managed offering?

Identical at $11.00/month for 1GB RAM, 1 vCPU, and 25GB storage. The gap is $6.00/month versus this host’s base $5.00 plan, but specs align when comparing managed-to-managed.

Is the uptime reliable?

100% over 30/90/365 days — same as DigitalOcean’s managed tier. Zero recorded downtime in the last year across both hosts.

What’s the performance difference in milliseconds?

Desktop TTFB is 10ms slower (100ms vs. DO’s 90ms), but fully-loaded time beats DO by 24ms (245ms vs. 269ms). No synthetic benchmarks; these are real-user metrics.

Can I scale RAM without overpaying for CPU?

Yes. The $10.00 2GB plan doubles RAM to 2GB and storage to 55GB while keeping 1 vCPU — a clearer RAM:CPU ratio than DO’s managed tier offers at this price.

Why choose this over DigitalOcean’s unmanaged options?

Developer tradeoff: identical uptime and near-identical performance, but $6.00/month saved at entry. If you need managed services, the price parity makes DO competitive.

Any hidden renewal spikes?

No data on renewals in the pack. Current entry is $11.00/month (managed) or $5.00/month (unmanaged) — confirm terms before scaling.

Cloudways — LCP
Collecting time-series…

Reproducible, timestamped — how we test.

Vultr — LCP
Collecting time-series…

Reproducible, timestamped — how we test.

Want a different matchup? Compare differently →